Hol’ up. Trespassing and Larceny? First of all, due to MC demanding an apology, the old guy invited MC there. So there was no trespassing at all. As for Larceny, ill be honest, for many years, i didnt care enough to know what it meant, so i had to look it up. Apparantly its essentially theft. MC didnt steal anything from him, unless we’re talking about MC recording the conversation and leaving with it. Either way, that’s absolute BS too. Basically, there was no trespassing or larceny involved. It sounds to me like the author just needed to BS themselves a way to make it seem like MC would be in some legal trouble or whatever. Author could have done a better job with this.
MrBojingo
Hol’ up. Trespassing and Larceny? First of all, due to MC demanding an apology, the old guy invited MC there. So there was no trespassing at all. As for Larceny, ill be honest, for many years, i didnt care enough to know what it meant, so i had to look it up. Apparantly its essentially theft. MC didnt steal anything from him, unless we’re talking about MC recording the conversation and leaving with it. Either way, that’s absolute BS too. Basically, there was no trespassing or larceny involved. It sounds to me like the author just needed to BS themselves a way to make it seem like MC would be in some legal trouble or whatever. Author could have done a better job with this.